My 60's Fender Shortscales...
Moderated By: mods
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16695
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
The first guitar I ever played was a '58 or '59 Duo - 22.5" scale of course. I've yet to have my hands on 24" Duo (I suppose I could make one out of my MM and Mustang!). I kind of did a shot in the dark w/ the Mustang - I just figured I'd like it. I really do. I prefer the Mustang bridge, but I think that the trem might be a tuning nightmare. I haven't had any real problems yet, as long as I make sure that I get the trem rocked forward before I tune.hotrodperlmutter wrote:ever played a vintage duo-sonic? might be right up your alley if you prefer hard tails to trems (i certainly do).
My next guitar will probably be a Duo II or a MusicMaster II w/ the 24" scale. The MM might be what I need - since I'm not a huge fan of the bridge pickup, and since those switches cramp my style a little bit!
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16695
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
My palm hits those switches - and I knocked my neck switch just enough to put it in the "off" position at band practice today. I was like "errr.... I've got no sound!" Took me a second to figure out.
I think that a MusicMaster will be right up my alley - w/ the 24" scale. I love the Mustang regardless, though. It is going to my luthier for a full makeover. I'll probably put some repro tuners on there (stock ones are somewhat sloppy - still work fine, but would rather have precision since this will be a gigging guitar). I'm also going to have some fret leveling done - and am considering just doing a total refret w/ some big ol' frets. We'll see what my luthier thinks will be best. He's amazing.
I think that a MusicMaster will be right up my alley - w/ the 24" scale. I love the Mustang regardless, though. It is going to my luthier for a full makeover. I'll probably put some repro tuners on there (stock ones are somewhat sloppy - still work fine, but would rather have precision since this will be a gigging guitar). I'm also going to have some fret leveling done - and am considering just doing a total refret w/ some big ol' frets. We'll see what my luthier thinks will be best. He's amazing.
Yeah, I'm fat and slow, though!silly_rabbit_band wrote:You said 6'1"? only 4" taller than I, and I've never met you. So, I'll take your word for it!Dice wrote:I really never heard any of those comments other than in photos!silly_rabbit_band wrote:No offense, and I know this has been stated, but man, you make any guitar look like a toy, I'm sure your stang and musicmaster look tiny on you!
Please don't crush me.
Its all good - I'm really not as big as I appear.
The little MusicMaster does look pretty small on me, by the way!
Oh well. Cool guitars - even if I look like a big dork!
-
More Cowbell
- .

- Posts: 6206
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:31 am
- Location: Jefferson, GA
For anyone still checking this thread, here is a very very low quality live video clip of the Jag. Again, the quality is absolutely terrible - and there is nothing exciting going on in this clip at all. Just a little off beat ska thing and some overdriven chords at the chorus - at a boring low key Tuesday night gig.
***WARNING: Crappy semi-punk-rock somewhat offensive content!!!***
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=58495268
My band is revamping most of our material at the moment - moving away from the slower paced rock/metal/numetal stuff and back to our "punk rock roots." Because this is the crowd response that we like to have:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=54297939
Once we get that new stuff finished up, I'll spam the band in the whorehouse.
***WARNING: Crappy semi-punk-rock somewhat offensive content!!!***
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=58495268
My band is revamping most of our material at the moment - moving away from the slower paced rock/metal/numetal stuff and back to our "punk rock roots." Because this is the crowd response that we like to have:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... D=54297939
Once we get that new stuff finished up, I'll spam the band in the whorehouse.
Last edited by Dice on Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
paul_ is small_
jag is not
Non-chambered Les Pauls are not that heavy. The ash tele custom I made (standard tele body routed for LP control scheme and WRHB in neck) is wayyy heavier.
jag is not
Non-chambered Les Pauls are not that heavy. The ash tele custom I made (standard tele body routed for LP control scheme and WRHB in neck) is wayyy heavier.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
Thanks Josh!
Paul - I won't own a chambered Les Paul to save my life!! Mine are all solid body (no weight relief, no chambering!). I've got a '69 Gibson Les Paul Deluxe, 2008 Custom Shop '58 Reissue, and a Japanese made (Fujigen) Epiphone Elitist Les Paul Custom. Mine are all pretty light. The '69 is in the 8's, the MIJ is 9, and the R8 is 9.5 (lbs). I did sell another MIJ that was 10lbs. Some Lesters are up there around 13 - even with weight relief holes! That is HEAVY! How much does your Tele weigh?
Paul - I won't own a chambered Les Paul to save my life!! Mine are all solid body (no weight relief, no chambering!). I've got a '69 Gibson Les Paul Deluxe, 2008 Custom Shop '58 Reissue, and a Japanese made (Fujigen) Epiphone Elitist Les Paul Custom. Mine are all pretty light. The '69 is in the 8's, the MIJ is 9, and the R8 is 9.5 (lbs). I did sell another MIJ that was 10lbs. Some Lesters are up there around 13 - even with weight relief holes! That is HEAVY! How much does your Tele weigh?
A little update here... A few pictures, and a couple of live videos:
An original (titled "Beaten"), and an impromptu cover / jam / semi-tribute w/ some solo action - both on the '65 Mustang:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... d=60296975
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... d=60399413
A few recent gig pix - also, I picked up a basketcase '66 Duo-Sonic since I made this thread, and the neck is now on my MusicMaster (which is heavy in the gig rotation now!):







An original (titled "Beaten"), and an impromptu cover / jam / semi-tribute w/ some solo action - both on the '65 Mustang:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... d=60296975
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... d=60399413
A few recent gig pix - also, I picked up a basketcase '66 Duo-Sonic since I made this thread, and the neck is now on my MusicMaster (which is heavy in the gig rotation now!):







the first pic you posted of the mustang is amazing.
also, i have realized that i need a musicmaster, more specifically, the musicmaster you have.
also, i have realized that i need a musicmaster, more specifically, the musicmaster you have.
jcyphe wrote: Mo is the most sensible person in this thread.
icey wrote:and thats for the hatters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
- SickenedEmotions99
- .

- Posts: 65
- Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:54 pm
- Location: Sparkill, NY
- Contact:
Same here. I used to play 2 different Mustangs... I'm 6'2 and 310 or so.the isaac eaton wrote:I have the same problem, Im 6'1 and I used to play a les paul jr, loved the sound and the feel, but it was so small on me, it looked like i was playing a toy.Dice wrote:Thanks much. A lot of people have said that the Jag looks small on me... I'm 6'1 or 6'2 (depending on the day, it seems) - not that big, really!FitzG wrote:Christ
you make that jag look like a toy!
awesome collection though
Here is another shot w/ it:

