i do it all the time. if something looks like a child's drawing of a guitar, why would i care what it sounds like? it could be the best playing/sounding guitar on earth, i still wouldn't buy one.Kestrel wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how people are quick to judge an instrument based on it's looks rather than how it plays and how it sounds.
Danophobic Hornet
Moderated By: mods
-
stewart
- Cunning Linguist
- Posts: 17661
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
I like them too, in concept...the 90's reissues (I own a DC-12, my girlfriend owns a Dano Convertible, and I used to have a baritone U2) were great guitars for the money, and just in general even.Kestrel wrote:Don't knock 'em until you try 'em. It never ceases to amaze me how people are quick to judge an instrument based on it's looks rather than how it plays and how it sounds. I personally like Danelectros.
Their brushed metal parts, fake aged paintjobs and pickguards, and model reissue inaccuracies put me off them. Also they hate the gays
-
dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1025286
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
that's what i'm talking about: the tedium of it. everybody's entitled to their opinions about anything, but having gay marriage constantly come up in a guitar info section just gets old. hopefully that d-bag sells the company soon, so we can just get back to admiring the cool things dano does with its gear.jcyphe wrote:I don't know if we should have the full on debate because it is so tedious but maybe some of us who just can't stomach these products anymore can ignore any thread with Dano stuff.timhulio wrote:Nah disagreed. Every time a discussion of new Danelectro product comes up, people should be reminded why it's wrong to buy it.
