has this acoustic always been 299.99?

Talk about all other types of guitars. Jazzmasters and basses go here!

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

has this acoustic always been 299.99?

Post by robroe »

cuz i fucking want it now more than ever.

http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-FEN-0968300-LIST

Image
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

its got baby kitty inlay for christ sake
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

i used to like this dude almost as much as pac.

i got S/T, lets go, out come the wolves, and life won't wait all on tapes.


not sure what he has done since highschool though. other than that song he and kurdt wrote for that chick that sounds like courtney that i post all the time.



Image
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
mickie08
.
.
Posts: 6588
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Contact:

Post by mickie08 »

Yeah, it has always been 299 to 349 range. Played one once. Not bad for a Fender acoustic, kind of how some 100 guitars still play and sound OK. but with acoustics I really do think the quality of the wood and preamp/pickup both make a huge difference, whereas on an electric you can change all of that shit out for less than a hand job from Chico. Not so easy on an acoustic. In other words, decent low level acoustic electric that has a cool look to it and sounds "ok" plugged in. Sounded worse than my $179 Great Divide backup acoustic and tons worse than my $800 Takamine main acoustic.

But I have always been a bit biased against Fender acoustics. I have never heard one live that sounded good plugged in and I have run sound for probably 100 people playing Fender acoustics at different jams, etc and they always sound thin unless the owner had modded them or spent alot of $ getting them professionally set up and adjusted.
They say great minds think alike....Sometimes we do too...
User avatar
brainfur
.
.
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Post by brainfur »

I still call him lint
User avatar
pumpkin
on the road to bantown
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Post by pumpkin »

How does this joker end up getting, 1 let alone 2 signature models? Rancid weren't even that big. He must know somebody. It's just odd.
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16695
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

robroe wrote:not sure what he has done since highschool though.
Image
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
Billy3000
.
.
Posts: 3033
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Atlanta

Post by Billy3000 »

mickie08 wrote:Yeah, it has always been 299 to 349 range. Played one once. Not bad for a Fender acoustic, kind of how some 100 guitars still play and sound OK. but with acoustics I really do think the quality of the wood and preamp/pickup both make a huge difference, whereas on an electric you can change all of that shit out for less than a hand job from Chico. Not so easy on an acoustic. In other words, decent low level acoustic electric that has a cool look to it and sounds "ok" plugged in. Sounded worse than my $179 Great Divide backup acoustic and tons worse than my $800 Takamine main acoustic.

But I have always been a bit biased against Fender acoustics. I have never heard one live that sounded good plugged in and I have run sound for probably 100 people playing Fender acoustics at different jams, etc and they always sound thin unless the owner had modded them or spent alot of $ getting them professionally set up and adjusted.
I agree. I've never been a fan of fender acoustics.
User avatar
Nick
Y'SEE!?
Posts: 10078
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:13 am
Location: Albany, NY

Post by Nick »

I never played THIS model but I've played enough Fender Acoustics to believe and agree with everything Mickie said